Smart Roads Alliance


The Jackson County Smart Roads Alliance was formed in 2002 in response to a proposal by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to build a new $132 million* highway through the middle of our most precious and beautiful rural county. Our goal since 2002 has been to work together as a community and create smart solutions to our traffic and transportation issues. (* $132 million construction cost source: NCDOT 2008)

For the latest news and information:

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter. Spread the word!

North Carolina Department of Transportation


NCDOT is planning to build the $132 million Southern Loop Bypass (NC 107 Connector) from US 23-74 in Balsam to NC 107 between Sylva and Cullowhee - NCDOT project STIP R-4745 is funded and construction will begin in 2016 unless the public demands other solutions.

The Resolutions

The Resolutions, unanimously signed in 2003 by the representative leaders from all four of Jackson County's incorporated towns (Sylva, Dillsboro, Webster, Forest Hills) requested that NCDOT "remove the Southern Loop Bypass from its long-range plan" and instead develop strategies for "improving existing roads as alternatives to the Bypass". A copy of the resolution and a petitions with thousands of Jackson County citizen's signatures were turned in to NCDOT at their annual State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) meetings to stop this proposed new highway. Despite public opposition, NCDOT is moving forward with this massive new highway project.

Other important articles with background information:
2009 - Smart Roads Alliance Position: Jackson County Comprehensive Transportation Plan
2008 - Construction on 23-74/107 connector could begin in 2015
2008 - Smart Roads Files Compaint Over Southern Loop
2008 - Smart Roads Event Discusses Alternatives to Southern Loop
2007 - Leaders, citizens demand input as road plan progresses
2007 - Southern Loop Opposition Mounts
2007 - Burrell, Setzer Plug Plan for Southern Loop (ignoring public outcry and towns' wishes)
2007 - Southern Loop On Priority List, Transportation Advisory Committee Disagrees
2007 - STIP Includes Funding For Portion of Southern Loop
2003 - "Who will decide the future growth of Jackson County?"
2003 - Sylva, Dillsboro Join Official Opposition to Southern Loop (The Resolutions)
2002 - Smart Roads Alliance Formed
2001 - NCDOT Division 14 Engineer Ron Watson updates EDC on 'southern loop' status
2001 - Southern Loop Feasibility Study Approved


The original proposed new highway project would have cost over $230* million to construct ($26 million per mile) and continued to US 23-441 through Webster. The Jackson County Smart Roads Alliance was instrumental in getting the Webster portion of the bypass removed from the R-4745 plan. (* NCDOT 2001 estimate)

LATEST NEWS

Most recent news listed at top. Scroll down to see additional news items.
Visit our Community News Archive or Search Blog to view older articles (since 2007).
You may post or read comments for any news item.

For older news articles (2000 - 2007) click here.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Letter: Task force meeting was 'puzzling'

The Sylva Herald
Letters to the Editor: 02/28/08

Task force meeting was 'puzzling'

To the Editor:

Observing the Feb. 13 Jackson County Transportation Task Force meeting
was a puzzling experience for this taxpayer. While grateful that it was
open to the public, I left wondering what exactly the Department of
Transportation means when they assure us they are responsive to the
community.

The bulk of the meeting focused on developing data for a comprehensive
transportation plan and included the circulation of a proposed
community survey. One might have never guessed that there was a highly
controversial road lurking in the background.

Finally, at the end of the agenda, Walter Kulash, an independent
traffic consultant representing the Smart Roads Alliance, brought up
the subject of the Southern Loop – the "elephant in the room." From his
questions I learned that DOT has already started an environmental study
for the proposed four-lane highway, despite considerable public
opposition as far back as when the Southern Loop was first proposed. I
later learned that this particular project/environmental study comes
with a $2 million price tag.

When Kulash pointed out that such a study could expand its scope of
work to include a consideration of alternatives, DOT (District
Engineer) Joel Setzer answered with something that struck me as
equivalent to "trust me." Setzer suggested that the comprehensive plan
might deal with alternatives "perhaps in 2009." Why in the world should
the public or the task force wait that long for serious consideration
of alternatives? Shouldn't such a study include alternatives now?
Common sense says "yes."

One of the items on the agenda was a draft for a community survey. The
gist of the survey questions aim at whether there is a traffic problem,
where the congestion is and whether we want more efficient roads. No
questions about the public's preference for solutions – do we want a
multi-lane freeway or do we think traffic problems can be solved by
other solutions?

I hope the task force will revise the survey to include such questions.
But even if they do, it remains to be seen whether the DOT will pay
attention to the answers. If the DOT is responsive to community
concerns, that should be reflected in their actions. It isn't enough to
say "trust us."

Pat Montee
Sylva

County residents are invited to complete transportation survey

County residents are invited to complete transportation survey
The Sylva Herald
February 28, 2008

Jackson County, the Southwestern Rural Transportation Planning
Organization and the N.C. Department of Transportation's Planning
Branch are seeking public input as part of Jackson County's
Comprehensive Transportation Plan.

County residents are asked to complete a short survey to identify
transportation issues and needs, with answers being used to prepare a
county CTP.

During the CTP process, the county's future transportation needs will
be determined, and solutions will be recommended, according to
Southwestern Commission transportation planner Ryan Sherby. Alternative
modes of transportation will also be studied, and the process will
involve local government officials and the public. Public workshops
will also be held in the future to receive additional input on local
transportation issues.

Paper copies of the survey are available at the Jackson County Public
Library, the Jackson County Planning Department, Sylva's town hall, and
the offices of the Southwestern Commission. The survey can also be
downloaded or completed online at

http://www.regiona.org/econdev/transportation-planning.htm.

Those who are unable to access the survey online or pick up a copy may
call Sherby at 586-1962, ext. 214, or e-mail him at ryan@regiona.org.

Surveys should be completed by March 31 and returned to Ryan Sherby,
Southwestern Commission RPO, 125 Bonnie Lane, Sylva, NC 28779.

Comments on the community survey

On behalf of Smart Roads we wish to make the following observations re:
the current course of the task force. We assume the recent
transportation survey has been developed by NCDOT and the RPO, and
there exists a genuine interest in reaching the public for "input."
 
We find the deadline [March 31, 2008] for completed surveys to be
somewhat arbitrary. Smart Roads
is planning a transportation "display" at the Public Library in April;
we are also planning to table at the "Greening of the Mountains"
Festival in Sylva [in April], an event that draws thousands of people.
Thus we feel the survey could reach significantly more people if the
deadline were extended until April 31, 2008. Perhaps this could be
discussed and voted on via emails among task force members.
 
A more pressing problem exists: the task force [and the community
survey] are proceeding as if there is no controversy over the southern
loop. Is the task force going to proceed until June[?], 2009 with a
comprehensive transportation plan that totally ignores the "elephant in
the room?"
 
We have been told by DOT officials for the past year there is clear
public support for the southern loop; this was later "qualified" by DOT
as "indirect public support." However no official DOT documentation
supports this.
 
The survey should at least make some attempt to determine
public support or non-support for constructing a "multi-lane freeway."
This could be done in the spirit of a somewhat feckless and general
survey question, something comparable to question # 10-e.g. such as:
"Are there any specific transportation issues that you are particularly
concerned with that are NOT addressed by this survey?" Such a question
might actually give the public an opportunity to deal with real issues
[without mentioning the southern loop].
 
The current survey is professional, predictable, and serves the purpose
of confirming we have traffic problems.
 
We feel the addition of such a question is important enough to merit
discussion at the next task force meeting on March 12. If the surveys
have been printed and circulated, then we propose the deadline be
extended until April 31 to allow for a 1/8-1/4 page insert be added for
such a question [in hard copy]. This would be no problem with
electronic surveys. Additional questions should be approved by the task
force.
 
It is time the DOT/RPO proceed in "partnership" with the county task
force. Please don't tell us it is too early in the "process" to address
this issue.
 
Respectfully,
 
Susan Leveille
Roger Turner
Smart Roads Alliance

Thursday, February 21, 2008

The Sylva Herald - Letters To The Editor

The Sylva Herald
February 21, 2008
Letters To The Editor

Sylva needs safer roads

To the Editor:

"Not new roads, smarter roads" reads a popular bumper sticker. The
building of the Southern Loop is under debate, but one fact that will
not be disputed is the need for smarter, safer roads.

As a Franklin resident who spends much time in the Sylva/Cullowhee
area, I am often told by Jackson locals that Franklin is an odd and
even scary town. If Franklin is shady or creepy, I have become
acclimated to it so as not to notice. I do know that I find Sylva, from
N.C. 116 to downtown to be very scary when it is dark and raining. When
Jackson County residents divulge to me their negative feelings toward
Franklin, I say, "hey, at least Franklin has reflectors on its roads."
They seem to stop and reflect, their faces flashing back agreement.

I am terrified driving through a dim, damp Sylva. The painted lane
markers are concealed underneath the reflective surface of rainwater.
If the stripes do reflect the light of headlights, they are not
discernible against the striped myriad of reflected tail-lights,
headlights, traffic lights, store lights and so on. Drivers must strain
to know their locations in the lanes and must trust that the drivers
around them know where they themselves are. Motorists drive into the
lanes of opposing traffic, thinking they are in a turn-lane, thereby
presenting ample opportunity for collisions. Now isn't that scary?

Come on Sylva. Make N.C. 107 a smarter, safer road by making the lanes
clearly visible in all weather situations.

Until Sylva installs road reflectors, I must say if I were to choose
between Franklin and Sylva, Sylva is scarier, at least with respect to
traffic.

Thomas Berger
Franklin

Fix is in' on Southern Loop

To the Editor:

Well it seems that the forces of "progress" are back at it again on
this Southern Loop highway that they are determined to ram down
people's throats. This time, because they were hammered with so much
resistance on their last foray, they have taken the Washington, D.C.,
approach of trying to sneak it in through backroom deals and "private"
meetings. The Smart Roads organization is trying to fight this erosion
of Jackson County, but they need help. I know that if your house is not
on the chopping block this seems like no big deal, but remember, they
can always come for your home on their next pork project. This road is
desired by a select few that will derive financial and political
benefit from a highway ripping a gash in the mountainsides of Sylva and
Webster. Make no mistake, there are some of your elected officials that
are all about this road happening, and it would be prudent to find out
whom, and make sure that they do not get re-elected – ever. They are
putting the wants of a very few over the wants of the community, and
using the power of eminent domain as a crowbar to break in and steal
people's land. In the case of my family, (it's) land we have had for
more than 100 years. Follow the cigar smoke, folks, and find the fat
man.

People have come to Jackson County for decades to escape congestion,
pollution and overcrowding. But now we have some that wish to inject
those things into this beautiful mountain oasis. This road will be of
great benefit to the massive expansion of Western Carolina University.
It will also help out the "mega-bucks" communities being developed
around Bear Lake and in Cashiers. But it is zero benefit to the local
residents. The locals will get the shaft, as usual, in a nice, pretty
package tied up with a bow. Drive up to where I live in New Jersey if
you want to see what you are going to be getting, or drive down to
Atlanta or to Raleigh. Is that what you want? This road will destroy
untold acres of pristine mountain land, and it will destroy the homes,
dreams and memories of hundreds of native citizens who just happen to
be in the way of a few greedy people's "progress." Stand up and fight.
This affects all of us. Don't allow backroom deals and sleazy politics
to destroy something as grand as our mountains. Once you send in the
bulldozers, there is no getting it back.

Frank Huguelet
Pennsville, N.J.

County transportation task force establishes study boundary

County transportation task force establishes study boundary
The Sylva Herald
February 21, 2008
By Lynn Hotaling
http://thesylvaherald.com/html/county_transportation_task_for.html

Members of Jackson County's transportation task force last week (Feb.
13) identified a study boundary and determined existing roads that will
be included as they proceed toward developing a comprehensive
transportation plan.

Meeting for the first time in six months, the group heard from N.C.
Department of Transportation planner Sarah Smith that delineating a
boundary and identifying the existing thoroughfares to be included are
the necessary first steps that could lead to a Jackson County CTP by
June 2009.

Several present, including Smart Roads Alliance member Susan Leveille
and that group's consultant, Walter Kulash, questioned why planning for
the controversial Southern Loop is proceeding separately from the task
force's discussion of the county's transportation needs.

That road, proposed in 2003 as a link from U.S. 23/74 near Blanton
Branch to U.S. 23/441 near Cagle Branch, is now discussed by DOT
officials in terms of a "link" between U.S. 23/74 and N.C. 107 or Old
Cullowhee Road (S.R. 1002).

Kulash asked why DOT is looking at a new road before the CTP identifies
the county's transportation needs.

District 14 Division Engineer Joel Setzer, who was at the task force
meeting, said it's because planning with regard to the Southern Loop
will take a long time to develop. Also, he said that he doubts there
will be a corridor link with existing roads, and that it's highly
likely some kind of link will be shown to be needed.

When Kulash asked if the DOT's process could be expanded to include
alternatives besides a new road as well as a broader corridor, Setzer
said the DOT's scoping process for the new road is not complete and
that alternatives have not been set.

"The way I intend to present it is that we need to look at constructing
a link," Setzer said. "Does it need to end on old 107 (now Old
Cullowhee Road) or new 107? We're not considering just one thing."

After Kulash stated that Southern Loop planning didn't seem to be a
"transparent process," Setzer offered to have the Southern Loop project
engineers attend a task force meeting to answer questions.

When Leveille asked whether the Southern Loop is proceeding without
input from the task force, Setzer said that planning is taking place.
That planning does not include all the way from U.S. 23/74 to U.S. 441,
however, and only one meeting has been held so far, he said.

"There's nothing hard and fast," Setzer said.

"So that process will proceed with or without this task force?"
Leveille asked.

"It currently is proceeding, and the task force is proceeding," Setzer
said. "There are opportunities for them to mesh – if you proceed on
schedule (and have a CTP) by June 2009, those things will be meshed. By
then we'll know a lot more about the development of (the Southern Loop)
project."

Leveille pointed out that the reason the group, which was first
organized in 2003, is not on schedule is not the fault of the task
force but due to changes in DOT and Region A planning personnel.

"We can't be held up by the DOT again," she said.

County Commissioner William Shelton, who was also present for the
session, said it was the county's intent that the work of the task
force would mesh with DOT planning and that the task force's input
would weigh into the Southern Loop project.

The question of the Southern Loop corridor also came up during the
group's discussion of a study boundary, when Leveille said she thought
any area the DOT is considering as a potential Loop route should be
included in the study area.

Setzer responded that since Cullowhee is the destination and the DOT is
trying to develop a connector from 23/74 to either old or new 107, he
thought the proposed southern project boundary – the N.C. 107/N.C. 281
intersection – "is far enough south to capture the link."

The study boundary approved Feb. 13 is larger than an earlier one
identified during the task force's first meeting in 2004. It includes
all of U.S. 441 from Cherokee to the Macon County line and extends out
23/74 to its intersection with Skyland Drive at Sugarloaf. As mentioned
above, it extends out 107 to Tuckasegee.

Roads listed by the task force in its study include all those within
the boundary that are not dead ends – N.C. 107, North and South River
roads, Old Cullowhee Road, N.C. 116, Little Savannah Road, Cope Creek
Road and Centennial Drive.

Task force member Jay Coward asked whether Cane Creek, Locust Creek and
Fairview roads should be part of the study; town of Sylva Planning
Director Jim Aust said they should not be, because they are currently
dead ends.

Such roads could become connecting roads under a plan developed by Aust
as a possible alternative to the eastern portion of the Southern Loop.
The Smart Roads group and Kulash have endorsed that plan, which
includes construction of sections of new two-lane roads to connect
existing roads and create travel alternatives to N.C. 107. The Aust
plan was not discussed during Wednesday's meeting.

With the task force's approval of the study boundary and network roads,
Smith said DOT planners will continue with data collection with regard
to those roads.

"Right now we're looking at the current traffic and current capacity,"
she said. "Once we have the current capacity, we'll look at future
traffic projections to see what to do to address it."

That data should be available at the group's next meeting, which is
scheduled for 10 a.m. Wednesday, March 12, in Room A-227 of the Justice
Center, Smith said.

The other major topic discussed Feb. 13 was a survey that's planned to
gather additional public input on residents' traffic concerns.

According to Smith, DOT planners have found that public information
sessions work better once some recommendations are made, but a survey
would be a way to gauge the public's current feelings.

Plans are to post the survey online and have copies available at town
halls and libraries. Target dates for the survey to be available are
March 1 through March 31.

The proposed survey asks respondents to identify the community they
live in, state their race or ethnicity and give their age. It asks them
to rate the importance of transportation goals such as increased public
transportation options, economic growth, community and rural culture
preservation, environmental protection, faster travel times, service of
special needs and increased transportation choices.

Other questions ask if respondents currently use an alternate route to
avoid N.C. 107 and whether they would use sidewalks, off-road trails or
greenways, off-road bicycle routes, or buses, if such options were
available.

In addition, the survey will ask residents to identify locations where
they experience traffic congestion on a regular basis, when the
congestion occurs and possible reasons for the congestion, i.e. rush
hour, school bus pick-up/drop-off, lack of a left turn lane.

DOT accused of convoluted planning

DOT accused of convoluted planning
Smoky Mountain News
February 20, 2008
By Becky Johnson • Staff Writer
http://smokymountainnews.com/issues/02_08/02_20_08/fr_dot_accused.html

Opponents to the Southern Loop again urged the N.C. Department of
Transportation to halt planning for the new highway last week during a
meeting of the Jackson County Transportation Task Force.

They asked the DOT to hold off until the task force finished its
long-rang transportation plan — a plan that could reveal new solutions
to traffic congestion other than the Southern Loop. The DOT is backing
the development of the long-range transportation plan. But meanwhile,
it has also launched a $2.2 million planning process for the Southern
Loop.

An independent traffic engineer, Walter Kulash, questioned the
seemingly diametrically opposed planning tracks. Opponents fear the
Southern Loop will become a fait accomplis if planning gets too far
along, and that alternative solutions proposed in the transportation
plan won't get an honest look.

"I'm curious why we are continuing with a process for a very specific
type of solution," said Kulash, who has been enlisted by the Smart
Roads Alliance in its quest for alternative solutions to the Southern
Loop. "Why are we embarking on a study confined to a multi-lane freeway
in a fairly narrow geographic corridor while we are going through a
comprehensive transportation plan?"

Sarah Smith, a DOT staffer assigned to the task force, replied that the
two planning tracks — the Southern Loop planning on one hand and the
comprehensive transportation plan on the other — are two different
processes.

That was Kulash's point: the two processes seemed divorced when they
shouldn't be.

Joel Setzer, head of the DOT for the region, replied that it was a safe
bet to continue with the Southern Loop planning rather than wait on the
outcome of the transportation plan. In all likelihood, the
transportation plan will call for something akin to the Southern Loop —
a new link between N.C. 107 and U.S. 23-74, Setzer said. It will be
good to have a jump start on the planning since it is going to take so
long, Setzer said.

"I think it is highly likely after you've done the analysis that some
kind of link will be shown to be needed," Setzer said. "It is somewhat
of a gamble to proceed with project development, but project
development will take years to complete. The concept of this link is
going to take a long time to develop."

By then, the comprehensive transportation plan will have caught up,
Setzer said.

Conrad Burrell, a Jackson County resident who is the regional
representative on the state DOT board, was at the meeting with Setzer
but did not speak.

Susan Leveille, a representative of the Smart Roads Alliance on the
task force, asked Setzer if the planning for the Southern Loop was
proceeding without input by the task force.

"Unless you have given any input I don't know about to the project
engineer, the planning is proceeding," Setzer replied. The planning is
largely being handled out of Raleigh, with the local DOT branch serving
in an advisory capacity only.

County Commissioner William Shelton, a member of the task force, said
county leaders want to see the comprehensive transportation plan done
first — before the Southern Loop planning.

"The way I heard it just now is there is a chance that these two things
will mesh, and a chance they may not mesh," Shelton said at the
meeting. "I think we need to do everything in our power to make sure
they do."

Shelton reminded the room of the county commissioners' resolution last
fall calling on the DOT to place a comprehensive transportation list at
the top of its to-do list, ahead of Southern Loop planning. County
leaders were specifically asked to weigh in on the DOT's list of
priorities. The county commissioners unanimously ranked the
comprehensive transportation plan above the Southern Loop, Shelton
said.

"When we suggested this comprehensive transportation plan be brought
forward as a top priority, our intention was that it would not be two
separate things," Shelton said.

Shelton said people need to know whether the comprehensive
transportation plan will mean anything.

"The public perception is that this is a done deal. I think they need
to be told in layman's language that it is or isn't and whether or not
this comprehensive study is going to have an impact on the Southern
Loop," Shelton said.

Not everyone on the task force saw a problem with Southern Loop
planning and a comprehensive transportation plan being developed
concurrently. Dr. Cecil Groves, president of Southwestern Community
College, said the two will in all likelihood mesh. Groves said it is
wise to get a jumpstart on Southern Loop planning. The planning will
take so long as it is, additional delays should be avoided.

"By then you really have a mess brewing on 107," Groves said.

Task force tangle

Setzer said he had hoped the comprehensive transportation plan would be
done by now, then there wouldn't be a timing problem that everyone
seems so concerned about. But, it's not too late for the task force to
influence the planning process for the Southern Loop, he said. The
comprehensive transportation plan will take a year to complete.
Planning for the Southern Loop will still be in the early stages by
then, Setzer said.

"If your work is able to proceed on schedule and be close to 2009, and
you progress in your work, those two processes will be meshed
together," Setzer told the task force.

Leveille seemed offended. She said the task force would be delighted to
proceed in its work if DOT would stop holding them up. The task force
has been stalled by a revolving door of DOT staffers assigned to
oversee the task force, she said. The current staffer makes number
four. In between changes of the guard, the task force was put on hold,
sometimes for as long as a year. Jay Coward, a member of the task
force, has accused the DOT of purposeful "evasion and delay" of the
task force.

"To be held up for five years because the DOT couldn't join us, I trust
that won't happen again," Leveille said. "There are enough of us here
with good minds that we can move forward with something."

On the other hand, task force members did not take the initiative to
meet in the absence of a DOT staffer to oversee them. That's largely
due to a presumption that the DOT controlled the task force, down to
what could and couldn't be discussed at meetings, making the staffer in
charge feel like a handler rather than facilitator.

All in the wording

Kulash didn't dispute that N.C. 107 — the commercial drag and commuter
route in Jackson County — needs a new link. But not necessarily a
multi-lane freeway, he said. Kulash suggested broadening the scope of
the Southern Loop planning so the DOT wouldn't pigeonhole itself.

"I understand you have to get started on something now but can that
something have a broader scope?" Kulash asked.

Setzer said not to worry. The scope of the project hasn't been set yet,
he said.

Kulash questioned that assertion, however, pointing to a DOT memo
soliciting consulting firms to oversee the Southern Loop planning
process. The memo describes the job as "a multi-lane facility on new
location" with "controlled access."

"That knocks out anything other than multilane and any use of existing
roads," Kulash said. "If I was a consultant — and I am a consultant — I
would look at this and say 'You are asking me to design a multi-lane on
a new location.'"

Setzer said that wording was simply used to solicit consultants. Before
the consultants get started, they will get new marching orders. That
hasn't happened yet, he said.

In that case, Kulash asked Setzer to change the wording so as not to
bias the consultants. Better yet, Kulash asked if the task force could
participate in developing the wording to ensure that a "full and fair
range of alternatives" are studied by the consultants.

Setzer said it would.

"The DOT is not focused on just the alternatives that everyone says
they are," Setzer said. "There is nothing hard and fast and there is
nothing off the table."

Kulash was still skeptical, again pointing to the language in the memo
seeking consultants.

"I don't see a transparent process so that the task force members can
satisfy themselves that it is going forward with a sufficiently broad
scope," Kulash said.

A consulting firm for the Southern Loop has already been selected, KO
Associates out of Raleigh. The DOT has nearly finalized its contract
with KO, and the language is indeed less specific than the original
memo, according to Michael Penney, contract management engineer with
the DOT in Raleigh.

"The contract isn't written so specifically that it can't evolve. It
doesn't stipulate the type of facility," Penney said in a phone
interview.

The actual contract with KO describes the job this way: "The consultant
will perform project development associated with the proposed Southern
Loop around Sylva-Dillsboro from U.S. 23-74 to U.S. 441."

That leaves it open for the consultants to consider a boulevard-type
road, for example — although that's not the impression Penney said he
had of the project.

"If you are trying to move traffic from point A to point B most
expeditiously with the least amount of congestion then a boulevard
doesn't achieve that," Penney said. "It sort of depends on what is
driving the process."

Penney said his impression of the job was to design a new highway that
would move large volumes of traffic quickly. That concept was laid out
in the county's old comprehensive transportation plan developed in the
early 1990s, Penney said.

"Based on what we were provided, which was from a previous
comprehensive plan, that's what we were told," Penney said. "If they
change the comprehensive plan that would have to be taken into
consideration."

The real marching orders for the Southern Loop planning — the holy
grail of the planning process so to speak — will be the "purpose and
need" statement. That has yet to be developed, but once it is, it
becomes the litmus test by which everything else is judged. If an
alternative doesn't meet the "purpose and need," it won't be
considered.

If the "purpose and need" is broad — such as reducing traffic
congestion on N.C. 107 — it opens the door for all sorts of
alternatives to be considered. If the purpose and need statement is
narrow — such as build a new road around Sylva and Dillsboro — it will
confine the options that are considered.

Setzer said the "purpose and need" statement likely won't be drafted
until the fall.

What is the Southern Loop?

The Southern Loop is a proposed freeway that will bisect Jackson County
with an interchange over N.C. 107 somewhere between Cullowhee and
Sylva. It will tie into U.S. 23-74 somewhere north of Sylva and U.S.
441 somewhere south of Dillsboro.

What is a comprehensive transportation plan?

After five years of various hold-ups, the N.C. Department of
Transportation is finally embarking on a comprehensive transportation
plan for Jackson County.

In a nutshell, the plan will predict future traffic congestion and come
up with solutions.

"We'll have a number for future traffic, and we'll have the carrying
capacity for the roads. What roads in the future are going to go over
that capacity? That's where we have to come up with solutions — to
address those roads that are over capacity," explained Sarah Smith, a
DOT staffer in Raleigh assigned to the comprehensive transportation
plan.

Solutions could mean new roads or improving traffic flow of existing
roads. Solutions could mean the controversial Southern Loop freeway or
smarter intersection designs. The Jackson County Transportation Task
Force will serve as an advisory board during the process, but the plan
will ultimately be developed by DOT staff in Raleigh.

Residents have two chances to influence the transportation plan. The
first is by filling out a survey in March. The second is public
workshops in late-summer. Watch The Smoky Mountain News for how to
participate in both.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Overview of January 10th Public Information Meeting

> Dear Smart Roads Supporter:
>
> Thank you for coming to our Jan. 10 presentation on "Alternatives to
> the Southern Loop" at the Jackson County Justice Center. We estimate
> 200 people attended.
>
> We are at the beginning of a struggle that will determine whether many
> of us keep our homes, businesses, land, and rural landscape. This is
> really about the future of Jackson County, and involves all who live
> here.
>
> Our goals are achievable: to hold DOT accountable to its mission for
> community involvement (including the rejuvenation of the Jackson Co.
> Transportation Task Force) throughout its decision making process; to
> keep the public informed; and to demand DOT consider and implement
> viable alternatives to the southern loop.
>
> Walter Kulash, an independent traffic engineer, proposed one viable
> alternative on Jan. 10: by upgrading existing two-lane roadways we can
> create a "network" of roads that can alleviate local traffic on 107
> and possibly connect WCU's campus to US 23/74 without using a
> multi-lane freeway. Furthermore, Avram Friedman and Odell Thompson
> showed that public transportation can also play an important role in
> reducing traffic on 107 and meeting the future transportation needs of
> the WCU campus.
>
> We invoked the N.C. Public Records Act in Nov., 2007 to obtain all
> documents (since 2003) from District 14 DOT pertaining to the southern
> loop. We have reviewed this documentation and conclude that DOT
> followed its own agenda in placing the southern loop on a regional
> "priority" list of transportation projects. There was no public
> "process." This will be challenged.
>
> We have recently learned that DOT has authorized a $200,000
> Environmental Impact Study for eight miles of the southern loop,
> presumably the "funded" segment from US 23/74 to NC Hwy. 107. The
> beginning of this study is a flashing red light for us:
>
> $160,000 is from federal transportation funds. It is an important step
> in advancing this project. It is crucial that we make our opposition
> loud and clear to our elected representatives at the local, state, and
> federal levels NOW.
>
> In our next communication we will list the names of key officials who
> need to be contacted. Please consider writing or calling them. It is
> also important that your neighbors understand how far along this
> project has been advanced without input from the public. The southern
> loop can be stopped, but not by a small group. Our success depends on
> broad-based and clear opposition, starting with you.
>
> Thank you for being part of our great success on Jan. 10.

Smart Roads files complaint over Southern Loop project

Smart Roads files complaint over Southern Loop project

The Macon County News
January 31, 2008
By Jessica Richardson, Staff Writer
http://www.maconnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2052&Itemid=34

Citizens group accuses NCDOT of deception and secrecy

Two routes, a northern and a southern have been proposed for the
Southern Loop that would attempt to bypass traffic particularly from
WCU off of 107. The eastern section of the loop connecting to 23/74 has
already received funding.

Following a recent cancellation of a transportation task force meeting,
the Smart Roads Alliance issued a formal public comment to N.C.
Department of Transportation regarding its controversial Southern Loop.
The comment was issued formally against the State Transportation
Improvement Plan and received on Jan. 15 by a project oversight manager
in Raleigh.

In the comment submitted by Smart Roads' member John Chinners, the
alliance outlines the background of the project and continues to stress
an alternative to the Southern Loop that could potentially require
rights-of-way to more than 120 residences and nearly 20 businesses.
Smart Roads makes a demand that alternatives to the multi-lane highway
be considered as viable and a cost comparison be done.

"We demand that DOT clearly identify alternatives to the Southern Loop
and enlarge the 'scope of work' for its Federal Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to include such alternatives, including direct and
indirect potential impacts to the human and natural environments. We
also demand a cost comparison for the construction and mitigation of a
multi-lane freeway versus the upgrading of existing roads around 107
and/or an upgraded two-lane road nearer Western Carolina University
linking its campus and student traffic eastbound to Hwy 23/74."

Since its inception, the community-based organization has promoted
alternatives to the loop or bypass. As Chinners explains, the group has
worked with the transportation task force as well as local
municipalities in that effort. The Jackson County Board of
Commissioners created the task force in 2003, he said, with the task of
developing a comprehensive transportation plan to find solutions to
traffic congestion on 107. Solutions have included access management
strategies.

The Southern Loop is a planned four-lane bypass of 107 that would have
limited points of access. The highway would connect traffic to 23/74
East near Blanton Branch and 23/441 in Dillsboro. The road would
connect to 107 around South River Road and would feasibly reroute
traffic from Western Carolina University and possibly from Southwestern
Community College.

Also in 2003, Webster, Dillsboro, Sylva and Forest Hills passed
resolutions against the bypass. Smart Roads claims that "despite this
clear opposition, DOT proceeded with its planning for the southern
loop, which was placed on a 'prioritized' list of projects in 2006 by
Conrad Burrell and Joel Setzer."

Division 14 engineer Joel Setzer admits he and Burrell, division board
chair, told NCDOT that the road should be funded and cited continuing
through with a thoroughfare plan adopted by county leaders in the '90s
and noted that NCDOT is charged with addressing growth and increased
traffic. According to Setzer, though, the comprehensive transportation
plan is the current approach to the county road planning and that it
will consider other alternatives, even bussing, bicycling and
pedestrian paths. Until that plan is complete, NCDOT is moving forward
with the Southern Loop.

Little has been seen in the form of results from the relationship
between NCDOT and the Jackson County Transportation Task Force. The
lack of communication may stem from the fact that those assigned to the
task force have been based out of Raleigh and that person has changed
at least three times over the past five years. Setzer insisted that
community input will still play a large role in shaping the Southern
Loop project and other roads in the county.

Smart Roads hosted a public hearing on Jan. 10 that brought engineer
Walter Kulash to discuss a network of connections as an alternative to
the bypass.

According to the Smart Roads, "the concept for a network system was
first conceived by the Town of Sylva Planning Department in 2003," but
DOT considered the proposed alternatives and expansion of existing
roads as not feasible.

Smart Roads has accused NCDOT of moving forward with the plan despite
public opposition. According to Chinners, in November 2007, the group
invoked the N.C. Public Records Act to obtain all the documents from
District 14 pertaining to the Southern Loop and the task force. In the
comment, Chinners writes, "After reviewing this documentation we have
concluded: nothing in the documentation shows indirect public support
or any record of official meetings in support of the Southern Loop."

Smart Roads also claims that during a taped two-hour long recorded
discussion with Setzer that the decision to place the loop on a
priority list was based on "indirect public support and closed
breakfast meetings with local officials." Setzer claims that
information misrepresents him and has been used purposefully to mislead
the public.

DOT did recently place 107 on a list for a feasibility study, which,
according to Setzer, would take into consideration what would need to
be done to fix the road to carry projected 2025 traffic.

Before a Smart Roads Alliance public hearing two weeks ago, local
residents reviewed a map showing two potential routes for the Southern
Loop and wondered how their homes or businesses would be affected.
Such a feasibility study was conducted in 2003 on the Southern Loop
project, but it focused on two alternate routes for the road. That
study claims that the road is needed to relieve traffic congestion on
107 and US 23 Business in Sylva and Dillsboro. According to that
report, Jackson County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution in
2000 requesting an investigation of options to relieve traffic. So far,
DOT's suggestions have been limited to the proposed bypass.

As the feasibility study points out, the thoroughfare plan was adopted
by Sylva and Dillsboro in 1994, but Smart Roads focuses on the fact
that those same municipalities (as well as the county) have since
requested alternatives.

As Smart Roads member Jeannette Evans noted at the recent public
hearing, $7 million has already been designated by the state to begin
right-of-way purchase for half the road in 2010- 2013. According to a
map released by NCDOT, that funding would go towards the eastern half
of the roadway from where it intersects with 107 around River Road and
connects with 23/74 East near Blanton Branch.

In a recent interview, Setzer said the connection to 23/74 is a higher
priority in comparison to the section connecting to Dillsboro. "The
question is do they need to connect all the way to 441 or build the
connection to old 107 and stop?" He added that the second section may
not be needed for another 20 years or so. He estimated the cost of the
southern loop to be approximately $220 million.

NCDOT has also recently hired KO Associates to conduct an environmental
impact assessment at the price of $200,000 on the Southern Loop
corridor. Smart Roads concludes that NCDOT's efforts to move forward
with the project shows that decisions have been made without fair
public input.

"There has been a clear record of deception and secrecy by NCDOT over
the past four years re: this project, including the willful exclusion
or non-consideration of viable alternatives, specifically any
consideration of a network system of roads either parallel or around
107 that would facilitate local traffic patterns," said Chinners.

Just in Oct. 2007, DOT came under fire at the state level for a study
conducted by McKinsey and Co. regarding how to improve the agency's
accountability. The study came at a price of $3.6 million and was
criticized for a cloak of secrecy surrounding it and many sections of
the study being blacked out. Republican leaders like Senate leader Phil
Berger responded to the study. Said Berger, "North Carolina's
transportation bureaucracy is in desperate need of reform ... At this
point, most people are asking why the DOT required the expenditure of
$3.6 million for consultants in order to do those things that any
objective observer would have recommended. It is past time for the DOT
to cut through the red tape and instead, utilize the tax dollars
provided to the department to address the road needs of our State."

N.C. State Treasurer and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Richard
Moore recently set the goal of trying to curb political influence at
the DOT. He apparently wants to see more transparency in setting the
agency's road-building priorities and called for a publicly available
analysis of projects. He also wants to ban political donations and
political fundraising by the agency's nine-member board, according to
columnist Scott Mooneyham.

In Macon County, residents seemed equally surprised as those in Sylva
when the DOT held a public meeting last fall on four alternatives for a
Siler Road extension. Although the agency claims the cause for the road
is to provide better access to SCC's Macon Campus, documents indicate
an interest to serve private development as well. Macon County Board of
Commissioners issued a resolution opposing many aspects of the proposed
roadways. According to DOT representatives, the Siler Road extension
project will now go before environmental state agencies for review.

For more information regarding Smart Roads Alliance visit

www.smartroads.org

Those interested can make comments on the project through NCDOT's
website, www.ncdot.org. Be sure to note when making comments the number
of the Southern Loop project, R-4745 Division 14.

DOT contacts regarding Jackson County roads include DOT District
Engineer Joel Setzer at jsetzer@dot.state.nc.usThis email address is
being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
or Conrad Burrell c/o NCDOT – District 14 Sylva Office 253 Webster Rd.
Sylva, NC 28779.

Planning Consultant for Jackson County is Zaneta G. Adme, 1554 Mail
Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699, 919-715-5737 ext. 62,
zgadme@dot.state.nc.usThis email address is being protected from spam
bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Rural Planning Organizer Ryan Sherby can also be contacted at 125
Bonnie Lane Sylva, NC 29779, 828-586-1962 ext. 214. The Rural Planning
Organization acts as a liaison to the DOT and makes suggestions based
on input at rural planning committee meetings.

A Jackson County Transportation Committee meeting is planned for
Wednesday, Feb. 13, at 1 p.m. at the Jackson County Justice Center.

Friday, February 1, 2008

DOT must clarify Southern Loop alternatives

DOT must clarify Southern Loop alternatives
January 8, 2008
Smoky Mountain News
http://smokymountainnews.com/issues/01_08/01_30_08/op_edlet_dot.html

Editor's note: These comments were submitted to the N.C. Department of
Transportation by the Jackson County Smart Roads Alliance during the
DOT's annual public hearing on proposed road projects throughout the
region.

These comments are on behalf of the Jackson County Smart Roads
Alliance, a member of the Jackson County Transportation Task Force.

The Task Force was created by the Jackson County Board of Commissioners
in November 2003 to develop a comprehensive transportation plan and to
identify solutions for fixing N.C. 107. This included the use of access
management strategies for relieving traffic congestion.

At the time there were official resolutions in place from four
municipalities (Webster, Dillsboro, Sylva, and Forest Hills) opposed to
any further consideration or planning of the southern loop. Despite
this clear opposition, DOT proceeded with its planning for the Southern
Loop, which was placed on a "prioritized" list of projects in 2007 by
Conrad Burrell and Joel Setzer. According to Mr. Setzer, on Nov. 26,
2007, (during a recorded two-hour discussion at the DOT office in Sylva
with Setzer and Smart Roads), the decision to place the Southern Loop
on this list was based on "indirect public support," closed "breakfast
meetings" with local officials, and the lack of progress by the Jackson
County Task Force in developing a comprehensive plan.

In November 2007 Smart Roads invoked the North Carolina Public Records
Act to obtain all documentation from District 14 DOT pertaining to the
Southern Loop from the creation of the Task Force (2003) to November
2006. After reviewing this documentation we have concluded: nothing in
the documentation shows indirect public support or any record of
"official" meetings in support of the Southern Loop. Any reference to
the task force was in two short emails.

We now learn that DOT hired KO Associates in 2006 to do a $200,000
environmental impact assessment for the Southern Loop corridor, and yet
DOT continues to tell us there is no defined or established corridor.
Thus there has been a clear record of deception and secrecy by DOT over
the past four years regarding this project, including the willful
exclusion or non-consideration of viable alternatives, specifically any
consideration of a network system of roads either parallel (to) or
around 107 that would facilitate local traffic patterns.

The concept for a network system was first conceived by the Town of
Sylva Planning Department in 2003. The upgrading and expansion of
existing roads was clearly identified. However, without any known
analysis from DOT this expansion of existing roads was deemed
"infeasible."

We demand that DOT clearly identify alternatives to the Southern Loop
and enlarge the "scope of work" for its Federal Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to include such alternatives, including direct and
indirect potential impacts to the human and natural environments. We
also demand a cost comparison for the construction and mitigation of a
multi-lane freeway versus the upgrading of existing roads around 107 or
an upgraded two-lane road nearer WCU, linking its campus and student
traffic eastbound to U.S. 23/74.

Respectfully submitted,

John Chinners

Jackson County Smart Roads Alliance

"We are for the preservation of our communities.
We are not against growth and development,
nor a reasonable expansion of existing roads.
"

- Lydia Aydlett, Smart Roads Alliance

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
committed citizens can change the world.
Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."


- Margaret Mead